To investigate the difference between coils made with stranded and
solid
wire several samples were measured. Coil A is one of the original
loading coils. It is made from 0.75 mm
2 stranded wire. Coil
B is purpose build with 1.5 mm
2 solid wire. Coil C is made
from 0.75 mm
2 solid enamelled wire closely wound, and coil D
is made from 0.75 mm
2 stranded wire on a large diameter
form. All Q measurements were made at about 3.4 MHz.
Coil
|
N
|
D
|
winding length
|
wire length
|
L
|
Q
|
Rac
|
Rdc
|
A
|
76
|
50 mm
|
175 mm
|
11.9 m
|
104 µH
|
138
|
15.7 Ω
|
0.29 Ω
|
B
|
82
|
50 mm
|
225 mm
|
12.9 m
|
99.6 µH
|
377
|
5.6 Ω
|
0.16 Ω
|
C
|
90
|
40 mm
|
104 mm
|
11.3 m
|
139 µH
|
261
|
11.3 Ω
|
0.24 Ω
|
D
|
39
|
113 mm
|
112 mm
|
13.8 m
|
184 µH
|
152
|
25.5 Ω
|
0.346 Ω
|
Although it is not straight forward to compare the results of the
different coils, it is clear that the ones made with solid wire are
better than the ones made from stranded wire. For instance, the
difference between coil A and B is remarkable. The wire diameter of B
is only 1.4 times higher than that of A. If the ac resistance is
predominantly determined by the skin effect only, the ac resistance of
A would only be about 1.4 times higher, somewhere around 8Ω. In reality
it is almost 3 times higher. Even compared to the more compact coil C,
having the same wire diameter, coil A performs worse. Except for
coil C the spacing between the wires created by twice the thickness of
the insulation helps reducing the proximity effect. Nevertheless the
proximity effect is strong enough to cause the extra loss in stranded
wires.
Conclusion
In any application where Q-factor and efficiency is important : avoid
stranded wire !