|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HistoryThis is yet another antenna analyzer, but with a twist. The
analyzer was originally designed to replace my good old MFJ-259. The majority of these instruments are based on a reflection bridge in some shape or form. As I will explain this limits the impedance range of an instrument for a given accuracy. Since I mainly work with open line fed antennas I needed an instrument that could cope with the broad impedance range these antennas exhibit. So I decided to design and build my own analyzer based on a different measurement method. Although the concept for this analyzer was conceived early 2005, the first prototype, which I will refer to as version 1 was built in 2007. This version had the basic functionality and was designed around an Atmega8 controller. During the second part of 2007 the software was rewritten and a number of additional features were added. To accommodate the extra code I needed to switch to a different controller with a little more memory space.
Version 2 is based on an ATMega168, which is pin compatible with the original Mega8. Therefor only minor changes in the hardware were needed to make it work. Although some routines were made “more elegant” and additional routines were added, most of the code remained unchanged. After a period of debugging and testing I now feel that Version 2 is ready to be released. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test ResultsThis table shows test results from ARRL , Bob W5BIG and myself. Notice that most commercially available analyzers perform rather poorly at high impedances. This is partly due to the limitations of the measurement method and partly because of a more general problem with this type of measurement : stray capacitance. Every connector or test fixture has a certain amount of capacitance between its terminals. Not taking this parallel capacitance into account will result in large measurement errors. The reason why my design and Bob's AIM perform so well is that we both do calibrate for stray capacitance and correct the measurement results.CalibrationSince stray capacitance is the most
prominent source of
error it is measured during the calibration procedure. The measured
capacitance is than used to correct each reading. In version 1
calibration
was automatically done at start-up. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ConstructionThe analyzer is built on two separate PCB's. The HF PCB contains the PLL, VCO, Mixers, Switches, LPF, 48MH oscillator and synchronous detector. The Controller PCB carries the Controller, Differential amplifier, Display and RS232 level converters. The HF board is a double layer board of which the component side is used as a ground plane.The connections between the two boards carry only DC signals, so wiring is not at all critical. Look here for downloads and details
![]() ![]() It also offers a separate Smith Chart window to display complex reflection coefficient data. Moving the cursor over the impedance plot will show the measurement results for each individual frequency point, both on the linear graph and Smith chart. ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||